Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 84 of 84
  1. #81
    DreX.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    why do you care...
    Posts
    736
    it's needed.

    - - - Updated - - -

    everyone has the right to live obviously, but if giving that right consequent roping other people's very same right ( to live ); it's better of roped. .__.

    - - - Updated - - -

    over than killing, death penalty isn't relevant imo

  2. #82
    Banned The Sunset's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    231
    Yeah sure, why not.
    Provided - the victim(s) makes the choice (if still alive) and is not unnecessarily painful. No torture, just lethal injection, gunshot to temple or something.

  3. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by Jörmungandr View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What if he killed a lot of people? I don't think that letting him die would be a right choice. That's really ''soft'' punishment for what he did.
    You can't count how many lives a bad guy has taken off, as you cannot kill the murderer twice. Death is the worst punishment to all living creatures, which means killing one person or ten doesn't necessarily make any difference to them. I do agree with that some people deserve horrible punishment tho.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The death penalty is not needed in the modern society in my opinion, since killing a bad guy doesn't make the society more civilized but losing more potential benefits. There are many other ways to make them pay, such as labour forces.

  4. #84
    Lol @ people saying criminals should be tortured.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •